{"id":839,"date":"2023-09-05T22:05:16","date_gmt":"2023-09-05T22:05:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/arcticwatch.info\/index.php\/2023\/09\/05\/late-summer-heat-wave-arctic\/"},"modified":"2025-07-14T01:07:27","modified_gmt":"2025-07-13T23:07:27","slug":"late-summer-heat-wave-arctic","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/arcticwatch.info\/index.php\/2023\/09\/05\/late-summer-heat-wave-arctic\/","title":{"rendered":"Late summer heat wave avoids central Arctic"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

While the first half of August saw a\u00a0rapid pace of Arctic sea ice loss, the pace slowed during the\u00a0latter half of the month as mostly cooler\u00a0conditions set in. Antarctic sea ice extent increased during the second half of the month.<\/p>\n

Overview of conditions<\/h2>\n
\"Arctic<\/a><\/p>\n

Figure 1a. Arctic sea ice extent for\u00a0August 2023 was 5.57 million square kilometers (2.15 million square miles). The magenta line shows the 1981 to 2010 average extent for that month. Sea Ice Index<\/a> data. About the data<\/a><\/p>\n

Credit: National Snow and Ice Data Center
\nHigh-resolution image<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\"Graph<\/a><\/p>\n

Figure 1b. The graph above shows Arctic sea ice extent as of September 4, 2023, along with daily ice extent data for four previous years and the record low year. 2023 is shown in blue, 2022 in green, 2021 in orange, 2020 in brown, 2019 in magenta, and 2012 in dashed brown. The 1981 to 2010 median is in dark gray. The gray areas around the median line show the interquartile and interdecile ranges of the data. Sea Ice Index<\/a> data.<\/p>\n

Credit: National Snow and Ice Data Center
\nHigh-resolution image<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

August Arctic sea ice extent averaged 5.57 million square kilometers (2.15 million square miles), or the eighth lowest in the 45-year satellite record (Figure 1a). Extent was 1.63 million square kilometers\u00a0(629,000 square miles)\u00a0below the 1981 to 2010 reference period and 850,000 square kilometers (328,000 square miles) above the previous record low for the month set in 2012. As of the end of August, 2.24 million square kilometers (860,000 square miles) of sea ice was lost in the Arctic.<\/p>\n

As is typical during the latter half of August, the pace of ice loss slowed (Figure 1b).\u00a0 Nevertheless, the daily ice loss rate of 72,100 square kilometers (27,800 square miles) per day was faster than the 1981 to 2010 average of 57,200 square kilometers (22,100 square miles) per day.<\/p>\n

At month\u2019s end, the ice edge remained considerably farther north than average in the Beaufort, Chukchi and East Siberian Seas, while in the Kara and Barents Seas the ice edge was near its typical location, albeit farther north in a few scattered regions. In the East Greenland Sea the ice was also well north of its usual position, in large part because of reduced ice export out of Fram Strait. While the ice edge in the Laptev Sea was near average, large areas of low ice concentration and open water were present.<\/p>\n

The southern Northwest Passage, known as Amundsen\u2019s route, remains nearly ice free, and the northern deepwater route between M\u2019Clure Strait and Lancaster Sound has less ice than the previous record low for this time of year set in 2011. However, some ice still clogs M\u2019Clure Strait and ice in the Beaufort Sea hinders\u00a0easy access.<\/p>\n

Conditions in context<\/h2>\n
\"Arctic<\/a><\/p>\n

Figure 2a. This plot shows the departure from average air temperature in the Arctic at the 925 hPa level, in degrees Celsius, from August 15 to 31,\u00a02023. Yellows and reds indicate higher than average temperatures; blues and purples indicate lower than average temperatures.<\/p>\n

Credit: NSIDC courtesy NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory Physical Sciences Laboratory
\n High-resolution image <\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\"Average<\/a><\/p>\n

Figure 2b. This plot shows average sea level pressure in the Arctic in millibars from August 15 to 31,\u00a02023. Yellows and reds indicate high air pressure; blues and purples indicate low pressure.<\/p>\n

Credit: NSIDC courtesy NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory Physical Sciences Laboratory
\n High-resolution image <\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

During the second half of August, air temperatures at the 925 millibar level (about 2,500 feet above the surface) averaged 1 to 5 degrees Celsius (2 to 9 degrees Fahrenheit) below average in the Chukchi and East Siberian Seas, whereas above-average air temperatures prevailed in northern Greenland at 1 to 6 degrees Celsius (2 to 11 degrees Fahrenheit) (Figure 2a). Patches of warm conditions persisted\u00a0in the Kara and Barents Seas of 1 to 3 degrees Celsius (2 to 5 degrees Fahrenheit) above average, though cool conditions were nearby. This contrasts with the pattern observed in the first half of the month when temperatures were below average north of Greenland, above average in the Chukchi and East Siberian Seas, and considerably above average in the Kara and Barents Seas.<\/p>\n

Conditions shifted with the development of prominent areas of low sea level pressure over northern Canada and the Central Arctic Ocean; the latter feature is typical for this time of year (Figure 2b). By contrast, high pressure lingered over Greenland, the Norwegian Sea, and extended eastward along the Russian coast into the Laptev Sea. The high pressure over the Norwegian Sea and the implied winds from the south helped to transport warm air northward and also inhibited ice transport out of Fram Strait. Low pressure over the central Arctic Ocean helped to transport cold air southwards, contributing to the cool conditions over the Chukchi Sea.<\/p>\n

August 2023 compared to previous years<\/h2>\n
\"trend<\/a><\/p>\n

Figure 3. Monthly\u00a0August\u00a0ice extent for 1979 to 2023 shows a decline of\u00a09.9 percent per decade.<\/p>\n

Credit: National Snow and Ice Data Center
\n High-resolution image <\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

The downward linear trend in Arctic sea ice extent in August over the 45-year satellite record is 71,400\u00a0square kilometers (27,600 square miles) per year, or 9.9 percent per decade relative to the 1981 to 2010 average (Figure 3).\u00a0Based on the linear trend, since 1979, August has lost\u00a03.14 million square kilometers (1.21 million\u00a0square miles) of ice. This is roughly equivalent to twice size of state of Alaska or the country of Iran.<\/p>\n

Cascading impacts of changing sea ice conditions on marine ecosystems<\/h2>\n
\"present<\/a><\/p>\n

Figure 4. The top illustration shows\u00a0the current seasonal cycle in the diel vertical migration (DVM), also known as diurnal vertical migration of zooplankton and its links to sunlight. The bottom\u00a0panel shows a possible future scenario\u00a0of the impact of\u00a0earlier spring light penetration and later autumn freeze up on the DVM within the surface layer, up to 50\u2009meters (164 feet) of the Arctic Ocean. This assumes a \u2018business-as-usual\u2019 (SSP5-8.5) emission scenario. The intensity of the green-brown shading in the sea ice reflects potential changes in sea ice algae while the green shading of phytoplankton blooms is not scaled to productivity or biomass.<\/p>\n

Credit:\u00a0Based on scenarios shown in Soreide et al. 2010, Leu et al. 2011, Wassmann and Reigstad 2011, and Ardyna and Arrigo 2020
\nHigh-resolution image<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

The largest biomass migration on Earth each day happens within our oceans. Zooplankton, including tiny copepods and krill, migrate during the night towards the ocean surface to feed and then retreat to deeper depths during daylight to avoid predation. In the Arctic, however, the alternation of winter\u2019s polar night and summer\u2019s polar day results in a seasonal migration pattern. During the polar day, zooplankton primarily feed on phytoplankton blooms but during the polar night, they travel to the underside of the ice to feed on ice algae. As sea ice shrinks and thins, more light enters the ocean and shifts the seasonal migration. According to researchers at the Alfred Wegener Institute (AWI) and National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC) scientist Julienne Stroeve, zooplankton prefer to stay at depths where light levels are below a certain intensity. Using mooring data deployed at the end of the year-long Multidisciplinary drifting Observatory for the Study of Arctic Climate<\/a>\u00a0(MOSAiC) expedition, they quantify this critical light threshold. Using this threshold in climate model simulations, they conclude\u00a0that as sea ice continues to thin, the ocean level at which this critical light threshold is reached deepens earlier in the year, resulting in zooplankton remaining at depth for longer before coming to the surface to feed on sea ice algae. Currently, the zooplankton begin their springtime downward migration after nauplius larvae of the copepod\u00a0C. hyperboreus<\/em>\u00a0have migrated to the surface and developed to copepodites. As the ice cover reduces, this springtime migration will start earlier. This will change their feeding habits, perhaps feeding on the C. hyperboreus<\/em>\u00a0nauplii before they have fully developed. Changing light levels will also shift the biomass and seasonality of ice algae and phytoplankton, the food sources for zooplankton. Since zooplankton feed the fish that feed the seals and whales, this change can cascade through the marine ecosystem.<\/p>\n

Northwest Passage<\/h2>\n
\"sea<\/a><\/p>\n

Figure 5a. This time series graph shows total sea ice area for 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2011, and the 1991 to 2020 average within the\u00a0southern route of the Northwest Passage.<\/p>\n

Credit: S. Howell, Canadian Ice Service
\nHigh-resolution image<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\"Sea<\/a><\/p>\n

Figure 5b. This time series graph shows total sea ice area for 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2011, and the 1991 to 2020 average within the\u00a0northern route of the Northwest Passage.<\/p>\n

Credit: S. Howell,\u00a0Canadian Ice Service
\nHigh-resolution image<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

As of August 28, the southern route of the Northwest Passage, known as Amundsen\u2019s route, is almost completely free of sea ice (Figure 5a). The sea ice area in the northern route (deep water) is currently tracking just above 2011 record low conditions (Figure 5b). The route is almost sea ice\u00a0free with the exception of\u00a0the vicinity of the western end of M\u2019Clure Strait. Although ice conditions have been very light this year as well as in 2022, it is important to note that ice conditions can be highly variable. While light ice years in the Northwest Passage may occur more frequently as the Arctic continues to warm, the processes of sea ice transport and the aging of seasonal first year ice that\u00a0lead to heavy ice years in the Northwest Passage,\u00a0such as in 2021 and 2020, still continue to operate.<\/p>\n

Floe-ing with the landscape<\/h2>\n
\"satellite<\/a><\/p>\n

Figure 6. These three satellite images show buoy positions in red and sea ice conditions from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) on July 12, July 26, and August 6, from left to right. The blue star shows the location of the Multidisciplinary drifting Observatory for the Study of Arctic Climate <\/a>(MOSAiC) Central Observatory where one of the buoys was deployed.<\/p>\n

Credit: Howell, S. et al, 2023
\nHigh-resolution image<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

A recent paper led by colleagues at Brown University highlights the tight coupling between sea ice and ocean dynamics in the Fram Strait region. Fram Strait\u2014the passage between Greenland and the Svalbard archipelago\u2014is the key deepwater connection between the Arctic and Atlantic Oceans.\u00a0It is also the primary region where sea ice is exported from the Arctic Ocean into the Atlantic.\u00a0Figure 6 shows an ensemble of drifting buoys that were deployed\u00a0as part of the international Multidisciplinary drifting Observatory for the Study of Arctic Climate (MOSAiC) expedition in Fall 2019 in the Laptev Sea. The buoys were carried westward by the Transpolar Drift Stream, and then flushed through Fram Strait and into the East Greenland Sea during spring and summer 2020.\u00a0The authors documented clear changes in sea ice dynamics as the buoys crossed over undersea features, such as the Yermak Plateau north of Svalbard and the East Greenland Continental Shelf. These changes are concentrated at frequencies corresponding to tides and inertial oscillations, which show how the seafloor topography influences sea ice. The importance of ocean currents for the sea ice drift was further shown using a new ice tracking algorithm called Ice Floe Tracker. The team showed an increased role for ocean forcing relative to wind forcing on marginal ice zone sea ice in shallow seas and near the edge of the continental shelf.<\/p>\n

Antarctic growth accelerates<\/h2>\n
\"Antarctic<\/a><\/p>\n

Figure 7. The graph above shows Antarctic sea ice extent as of September 4, 2023, along with daily ice extent data for four previous years and the record high year. 2023 is shown in blue, 2022 in green, 2021 in orange, 2020 in brown, 2019 in magenta, and 2014 in dashed brown. The 1981 to 2010 median is in dark gray. The gray areas around the median line show the interquartile and interdecile ranges of the data. Sea Ice Index<\/a> data.<\/p>\n

Credit: National Snow and Ice Data Center
\nHigh-resolution image<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

After a brief period of slow growth during the first half of August, ice growth\u00a0quickened in the Southern Hemisphere. While the total Antarctic sea ice extent is still tracking at record low levels, the\u00a0ice extent has increased\u00a0more than average in the Bellingshausen and Amundsen Seas as well as in the Pacific Ocean. Elsewhere the ice edge remains further poleward than average.<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

References<\/h2>\n

Flores, H., G. Veyssi\u00e8re, G. Castellani, et al.<\/em>\u00a02023.\u00a0Sea-ice decline could keep zooplankton deeper for longer<\/a>.\u00a0Nature Climate Change,\u00a0<\/em>doi:10.1038\/s41558-023-01779-1<\/p>\n

Howell, S. E. L., D. G. Babb, J. C. Landy, and M. Brady. 2022. Multi-year sea ice conditions in the Northwest Passage: 1968-2020.<\/a> Atmosphere-Ocean<\/em>, 1, 15, doi:10.1080\/07055900.2022.2136061<\/p>\n

Howell, S. E. L., D. G. Babb, J. C. Landy, G. W. K. Moore, B. Montpetit, and M. Brady. 2023. A comparison of Arctic Ocean sea ice export between Nares Strait and the Canadian Arctic Archipelago.<\/a> Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans<\/em>, 128, e2023JC019687, doi:10.1029\/2023JC019687<\/p>\n

Watkins, D. M., A. C. Bliss, J. K. Hutchings, and M. M. Wilhelmus. 2023.\u00a0Evidence of abrupt transitions between sea ice dynamical regimes in the East Greenland marginal ice zone.<\/a>\u00a0Geophysical Research Letters<\/em>,\u00a050, e2023GL103558, doi:10.1029\/2023GL103558<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Antarctic sea ice extent increased during the second half of the month.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":840,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"rop_custom_images_group":[],"rop_custom_messages_group":[],"rop_publish_now":"initial","rop_publish_now_accounts":[],"rop_publish_now_history":[],"rop_publish_now_status":"pending","_themeisle_gutenberg_block_has_review":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-839","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-analysis"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/arcticwatch.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/839","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/arcticwatch.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/arcticwatch.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/arcticwatch.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/arcticwatch.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=839"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/arcticwatch.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/839\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3275,"href":"https:\/\/arcticwatch.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/839\/revisions\/3275"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/arcticwatch.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/840"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/arcticwatch.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=839"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/arcticwatch.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=839"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/arcticwatch.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=839"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}