{"id":508,"date":"2023-06-02T01:24:00","date_gmt":"2023-06-02T01:24:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/arcticwatch.info\/?p=508"},"modified":"2024-12-02T00:21:57","modified_gmt":"2024-12-01T22:21:57","slug":"the-rise-and-sudden-fall-of-the-arctic-council","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/arcticwatch.info\/index.php\/2023\/06\/02\/the-rise-and-sudden-fall-of-the-arctic-council\/","title":{"rendered":"The Rise and Sudden Fall of the Arctic Council"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>On May 11, 2023, in a much-anticipated&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.highnorthnews.com\/en\/russia-will-stay-arctic-council-long-it-serves-our-interests\">ceremony<\/a>, leaders from eight Arctic states and six Indigenous organizations assembled behind closed doors to witness a transfer of power. At first blush, it was routine Arctic Council business: this forum promoting northern cooperation rotates chairmanship every two years. But this had been no ordinary year, with no ordinary chair. The council\u2014suspended since Russia\u2019s invasion of Ukraine last year\u2014resurrected only to witness Russia hand the chairmanship to its Norwegian successor. And a peaceful transfer was far from a foregone conclusion.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cIt was an extremely straightforward meeting, which we see as a success,\u201d said Morten Hoglund, senior Arctic official for Norway, in a&nbsp;virtual&nbsp;press briefing from Tromso directly following the meeting. \u201cIf someone had an interest in it not going as planned, they could have easily derailed it.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>That \u201csomeone,\u201d of course, would have been Russia. Since the Arctic Council\u2019s unilateral&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.state.gov\/joint-statement-on-arctic-council-cooperation-following-russias-invasion-of-ukraine\/\">refusal<\/a>&nbsp;to cooperate with its largest geographical member last March, Russia has shown no sign of de-escalating its aggression against Ukraine. And the council\u2019s 130-odd circumpolar&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/arctic-council.org\/projects\/\">projects<\/a>\u2014tackling issues from science, to shipping, to Indigenous youth suicide\u2014have paid the price. For more than a year, this symbol of High North peace has fractured along territorial lines, awaiting a return to a status quo that seems increasingly impossible.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Today, with a NATO state back at its helm, the Arctic Council will officially resume its work. But it\u2019s still unwilling to include Russia, raising practical questions about what this forum can actually achieve without its largest geographical stakeholder. Russia makes up 45 percent of the geographical Arctic; shipping routes depend on its waters, and climate research depends on its data. Norway is now facing hard questions about the relevance of a \u201ccircumpolar\u201d forum that ignores half of the High North.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cTechnically speaking, there\u2019s no \u2018Arctic Council\u2019 without Russia,\u201d said Svein Vigeland Rottem, senior research fellow at the Norwegian Fridtjof Nansen Institute and author of the 2020 book&nbsp;<em>The Arctic Council: Between Environmental Protection and Geopolitics<\/em>. \u201cSo one could ask: What, exactly, is this group now?\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The Arctic Council, founded in 1996 in a post-Cold War vision of High North peace, has no real global equivalent. Along with representatives from eight foreign ministries, it\u2019s the only international group that includes Indigenous leaders as equal stakeholders. (The council\u2019s 13 observer states, made up of interested non-Arctic nations, attend but do not participate in meetings.) And, because its work is voluntary and not treaty-based, these leaders have flexibility to independently approve or invest in its projects.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cIt\u2019s a completely unique group formed around a specific set of challenges,\u201d said Lars-Otto Reiersen, who served as executive secretary of the council\u2019s Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Program (AMAP) for 25 years. \u201cMost leaders of Arctic states don\u2019t reside there. And most problems in the north can\u2019t be solved there, either.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Pollution was the first such problem to raise global attention. In 1991, Finland launched AMAP, then a postwar project to monitor contamination throughout the far north. The&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.amap.no\/documents\/doc\/arctic-pollution-issues-a-state-of-the-arctic-environment-report\/67\">findings were startling<\/a>: The<a href=\"https:\/\/www.thearcticinstitute.org\/persistent-organic-pollutants-pops-in-the-arctic\/\">&nbsp;blood of<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/www.thearcticinstitute.org\/persistent-organic-pollutants-pops-in-the-arctic\/\">&nbsp;Arctic&nbsp;<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/www.thearcticinstitute.org\/persistent-organic-pollutants-pops-in-the-arctic\/\">species and peoples&nbsp;<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/www.thearcticinstitute.org\/persistent-organic-pollutants-pops-in-the-arctic\/\">contained the planet\u2019s highest concentration of persistent organic chemicals<\/a>\u2014the vast majority of which came from industry farther south. The cold Northern regions acted as a \u201csink\u201d for these global pollutants, they found, and toxic chemicals were building up, or bioaccumulating, in the blood of polar species foundational to Indigenous diets. AMAP recognized a twofold challenge: to both establish a dialogue on the ground with Arctic communities, and at the highest levels to influence international law. Over the next decade, its data, coupled with policy recommendations, helped build the legally binding 2001 Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cIt was a success story of combining data you can\u2019t question with real actions for policymakers to take,\u201d Reiersen said. \u201cAnd it was an early model of close collaboration between scientists and Indigenous people.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In 1996, the Arctic Council formed in the spirit of this work: to protect the environment and peoples of the north. Since, its six expert-led working groups\u2014including monitoring, clean-up, conservation, oceans, peoples, search and rescue, and sustainable development\u2014have worked in the background to influence international law. Data&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/oaarchive.arctic-council.org\/handle\/11374\/54\">published<\/a>&nbsp;in its 2009 Arctic Marine Shipping Assessment directly informed the International Maritime Organization\u2019s regulatory&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.imo.org\/en\/MediaCentre\/HotTopics\/Pages\/polar-default.aspx\">Polar Code<\/a>. An AMAP&nbsp;<a href=\"about:blank\">report<\/a>&nbsp;on mercury contamination fueled the 2013 Minamata Convention regulating mercury. Since 2005, AMAP\u2014now a network of more than 700 experts\u2014has also contributed the entire Arctic section of the annual Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change report.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In March 2022, however, this vast network of science, policy, and diplomacy came to a screeching halt. For some projects, the pause was brief: By June, some projects without direct Russian involvement quietly&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/polarjournal.ch\/en\/2022\/06\/13\/arctic-council-to-resume-work-without-russia\/\">resumed<\/a>&nbsp;their work. The Indigenous Peoples\u2019 Secretariat, which supports the six Indigenous organizations independently of the council, also continued to operate. But for climate science and environmental monitoring projects\u2014which rely on consistent data collection across borders\u2014it was a massive blow.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>With a NATO state back at its helm, the Arctic Council will officially resume its work. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":509,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"rop_custom_images_group":[],"rop_custom_messages_group":[],"rop_publish_now":"initial","rop_publish_now_accounts":[],"rop_publish_now_history":[],"rop_publish_now_status":"pending","_themeisle_gutenberg_block_has_review":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-508","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-cooperation"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/arcticwatch.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/508","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/arcticwatch.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/arcticwatch.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/arcticwatch.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/arcticwatch.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=508"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/arcticwatch.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/508\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2494,"href":"https:\/\/arcticwatch.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/508\/revisions\/2494"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/arcticwatch.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/509"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/arcticwatch.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=508"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/arcticwatch.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=508"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/arcticwatch.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=508"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}