{"id":2425,"date":"2024-11-12T00:36:27","date_gmt":"2024-11-11T22:36:27","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/arcticwatch.info\/?p=2425"},"modified":"2024-11-18T00:45:18","modified_gmt":"2024-11-17T22:45:18","slug":"regional-fire-greening-positive-feedback-loops-in-alaskan-arctic-tundra","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/arcticwatch.info\/index.php\/2024\/11\/12\/regional-fire-greening-positive-feedback-loops-in-alaskan-arctic-tundra\/","title":{"rendered":"Regional fire\u2013greening positive feedback loops in Alaskan Arctic tundra"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Arctic tundra has experienced rapid warming, outpacing global averages, leading to significant greening whose primary drivers include widespread shrubification. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"Forest
Forest fire burn in the spruce trees adjacent to the James Dalton Highway, Arctic, Alaska (Patrick J. Endres \/ AlaskaPhotoGraphics.com)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Here we confirm that a fire\u2013greening positive feedback loop is evident across the Alaskan tundra, and evidence suggests that this feedback loop is dominated by the fire\u2013shrub interactions. We show that tundra wildfires, especially those with higher severity, play a critical role in boosting the overall greening of the tundra, often by enhancing upright deciduous shrub growth or establishment but sometimes by inducing increases in other vascular biomass. In addition, fire\u2013greening interactions vary greatly within different tundra subregions, a likely consequence of the spatial heterogeneity in vegetation composition, climatic and geophysical conditions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Data availability<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

All data used in this paper are publicly accessible. The field data that our team collected are available through the Oak Ridge National Laboratory Distributed Active Archive Center (ORNL DAAC) at https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3334\/ORNLDAAC\/1919<\/a>. The AKVEG is available at https:\/\/akveg.uaa.alaska.edu\/<\/a>. The MTBS product is available at https:\/\/www.mtbs.gov\/<\/a>. The CAVM dataset is available at https:\/\/www.geobotany.uaf.edu\/cavm\/<\/a>. The LandsatTS package for R is available via GitHub at https:\/\/github.com\/logan-berner\/LandsatTS<\/a>. Visualizations in this paper were implemented using ArcGIS Desktop (v10.6), and R (v3.5.1). Data analyses were carried out using R (v3.5.1), Python (v2.7.14), IDL (v8.5) and GEE.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

References<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
    \n
  1. Arctic Climate Change Update 2021: Key Trends and Impacts. Summary for Policy-Makers<\/em> 16 (AMAP, 2021).<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  2. Berner, L. T. et al. Summer warming explains widespread but not uniform greening in the Arctic tundra biome. Nat. Commun.<\/em> 11<\/strong>, 4621 (2020).Article<\/a>\u00a0 CAS<\/a>\u00a0 PubMed<\/a>\u00a0 PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0 Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  3. Elmendorf, S. C. et al. Plot-scale evidence of tundra vegetation change and links to recent summer warming. Nat. Clim. Change<\/em> 2<\/strong>, 453\u2013457 (2012).Article<\/a>\u00a0 Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  4. Sturm, M., Racine, C. & Tape, K. Climate change: increasing shrub abundance in the Arctic. Nature<\/em> 411<\/strong>, 546\u2013547 (2001).Article<\/a>\u00a0 CAS<\/a>\u00a0 PubMed<\/a>\u00a0 Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  5. Mekonnen, Z. A. et al. Arctic tundra shrubification: a review of mechanisms and impacts on ecosystem carbon balance. Environ. Res. Lett.<\/em> 16<\/strong>, 053001 (2021).Article<\/a>\u00a0 CAS<\/a>\u00a0 Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  6. Myers-Smith, I. H. et al. Shrub expansion in tundra ecosystems: dynamics, impacts and research priorities. Environ. Res. Lett.<\/em> 6<\/strong>, 045509 (2011).Article<\/a>\u00a0 Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  7. Stow, D. A. et al. Remote sensing of vegetation and land-cover change in Arctic tundra ecosystems. Remote Sens. Environ.<\/em> 89<\/strong>, 281\u2013308 (2004).Article<\/a>\u00a0 Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  8. Pearson, R. G. et al. Shifts in Arctic vegetation and associated feedbacks under climate change. Nat. Clim. Change<\/em> 3<\/strong>, 673\u2013677 (2013).Article<\/a>\u00a0 Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  9. Sistla, S. A. et al. Long-term warming restructures Arctic tundra without changing net soil carbon storage. Nature<\/em> 497<\/strong>, 615\u2013618 (2013).Article<\/a>\u00a0 CAS<\/a>\u00a0 PubMed<\/a>\u00a0 Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  10. Blok, D. et al. Shrub expansion may reduce summer permafrost thaw in Siberian tundra. Glob. Change Biol.<\/em> 16<\/strong>, 1296\u20131305 (2010).Article<\/a>\u00a0 Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  11. Loranty, M. M., Goetz, S. J. & Beck, P. S. A. Tundra vegetation effects on pan-Arctic albedo. Environ. Res. Lett<\/em>. 6<\/strong>, (2011).<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  12. Mack, M. C. et al. Carbon loss from an unprecedented Arctic tundra wildfire. Nature<\/em> 475<\/strong>, 489\u2013492 (2011).Article<\/a>\u00a0 CAS<\/a>\u00a0 PubMed<\/a>\u00a0 Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  13. French, N. H. F., Whitley, M. A. & Jenkins, L. K. Fire disturbance effects on land surface albedo in Alaskan tundra. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci.<\/em> 121<\/strong>, 841\u2013854 (2016).Article<\/a>\u00a0 Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  14. Hewitt, R. E., Hollingsworth, T. N., Stuart Chapin Iii, F. & Lee Taylor, D. Fire-severity effects on plant\u2013fungal interactions after a novel tundra wildfire disturbance: implications for arctic shrub and tree migration. BMC Ecol.<\/em> 16<\/strong>, 25 (2016).Article<\/a>\u00a0 PubMed<\/a>\u00a0 PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0 Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  15. Higuera, P. E. et al. Frequent fires in ancient shrub tundra: implications of paleorecords for arctic environmental change. PLoS ONE<\/em> 3<\/strong>, e0001744 (2008).Article<\/a>\u00a0 PubMed<\/a>\u00a0 Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  16. Hu, F. S. et al. Arctic tundra fires: natural variability and responses to climate change. Front. Ecol. Environ.<\/em> 13<\/strong>, 369\u2013377 (2015).Article<\/a>\u00a0 Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  17. French, N. H. F. et al. Fire in arctic tundra of Alaska: past fire activity, future fire potential, and significance for land management and ecology. Int. J. Wildland Fire<\/em> 24<\/strong>, 1045\u20131061 (2015).Article<\/a>\u00a0 Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  18. Higuera, P. E., Chipman, M. L., Barnes, J. L., Urban, M. A. & Hu, F. S. Variability of tundra fire regimes in Arctic Alaska: millennial-scale patterns and ecological implications. Ecol. Appl.<\/em> 21<\/strong>, 3211\u20133226 (2011).Article<\/a>\u00a0 Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  19. Gaglioti, B. V. et al. Tussocks enduring or shrubs greening: alternate responses to changing fire regimes in the Noatak River Valley, Alaska. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci.<\/em> 126<\/strong>, e2020JG006009 (2021).Article<\/a>\u00a0 Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  20. Chen, Y., Hu, F. S. & Lara, M. J. Divergent shrub-cover responses driven by climate, wildfire, and permafrost interactions in Arctic tundra ecosystems. Glob. Change Biol.<\/em> 27<\/strong>, 652\u2013663 (2021).Article<\/a>\u00a0 Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  21. Fastie, C. L., Lloyd, A. H. & Doak, P. Fire history and postfire forest development in an upland watershed of interior Alaska. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos.<\/em> 108<\/strong>, (2002).<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  22. Mack, M. C., Schuur, E. A. G., Bret-Harte, M. S., Shaver, G. R. & Chapin, F. S. Ecosystem carbon storage in arctic tundra reduced by long-term nutrient fertilization. Nature<\/em> 431<\/strong>, 440\u2013443 (2004).Article<\/a>\u00a0 CAS<\/a>\u00a0 PubMed<\/a>\u00a0 Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  23. Racine, C., Jandt, R., Meyers, C. & Dennis, J. Tundra fire and vegetation change along a hillslope on the Seward Peninsula, Alaska, U.S.A. Arct. Antarct. Alp. Res.<\/em> 36<\/strong>, 1\u201310 (2004).Article<\/a>\u00a0 Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  24. Higuera, P. E., Brubaker, L. B., Anderson, P. M., Hu, F. S. & Brown, T. A. Vegetation mediated the impacts of postglacial climate change on fire regimes in the south-central Brooks Range, Alaska. Ecol. Monogr.<\/em> 79<\/strong>, 201\u2013219 (2009).Article<\/a>\u00a0 Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  25. Bailey, A. W. & Anderson, M. L. Fire temperatures in grass, shrub and aspen forest communities of Central Alberta. J. Range Manag. Arch.<\/em> 33<\/strong>, 37\u201340 (1980).Article<\/a>\u00a0 Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  26. Berner, L. T., Jantz, P., Tape, K. D. & Goetz, S. J. Tundra plant above-ground biomass and shrub dominance mapped across the North Slope of Alaska. Environ. Res. Lett.<\/em> 13<\/strong>, 035002 (2018).Article<\/a>\u00a0 Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  27. Blok, D. et al. The response of Arctic vegetation to the summer climate: relation between shrub cover, NDVI, surface albedo and temperature. Environ. Res. Lett.<\/em> 6<\/strong>, 035502 (2011).Article<\/a>\u00a0 Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  28. Tape, K. E. N., Sturm, M. & Racine, C. The evidence for shrub expansion in Northern Alaska and the Pan-Arctic. Glob. Change Biol.<\/em> 12<\/strong>, 686\u2013702 (2006).Article<\/a>\u00a0 Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  29. Cunliffe, A. M. et al. Aboveground biomass corresponds strongly with drone-derived canopy height but weakly with greenness (NDVI) in a shrub tundra landscape. Environ. Res. Lett.<\/em> 15<\/strong>, 125004 (2020).Article<\/a>\u00a0 Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  30. Bret-Harte, M. S. et al. The response of Arctic vegetation and soils following an unusually severe tundra fire. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B<\/em> 368<\/strong>, 20120490 (2013).Article<\/a>\u00a0 Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  31. Racine, C. H., Johnson, L. A. & Viereck, L. A. Patterns of vegetation recovery after tundra fires in Northwestern Alaska, U.S.A. Arct. Alp. Res.<\/em> 19<\/strong>, 461\u2013469 (1987).Article<\/a>\u00a0 Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  32. Nawrocki, T. W. et al. Alaska Vegetation Plots (AKVEG) database. https:\/\/akveg.uaa.alaska.edu\/<\/a> (University of Alaska Anchorage, 2022).<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  33. Rocha, A. V. et al. The footprint of Alaskan tundra fires during the past half-century: implications for surface properties and radiative forcing. Environ. Res. Lett.<\/em> 7<\/strong>, 044039 (2012).Article<\/a>\u00a0 Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  34. Walker, D. A. et al. The Circumpolar Arctic Vegetation Map. J. Veg. Sci.<\/em> 16<\/strong>, 267\u2013282 (2005).Article<\/a>\u00a0 Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  35. Hu, F. S. et al. Tundra burning in Alaska: linkages to climatic change and sea ice retreat. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci.<\/em> 115<\/strong>, (2010).<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  36. Heijmans, M. M. P. D. et al. Tundra vegetation change and impacts on permafrost. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ.<\/em> 3<\/strong>, 68\u201384 (2022).Article<\/a>\u00a0 Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  37. Zhu, X. et al. A synthesized field survey database of vegetation and active-layer properties for the Alaskan tundra (1972\u20132020). Earth Syst. Sci. Data<\/em> 16<\/strong>, 3687\u20133703 (2024).Article<\/a>\u00a0 Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  38. Field data collection protocol for the Alaska Vegetation Map Version 1.0. AGC VWG<\/em> https:\/\/agc-vegetation-soa-dnr.hub.arcgis.com\/<\/a> (2024).<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  39. Eidenshink, J. C. et al. A project for monitoring trends in burn severity. Fire Ecol.<\/em> 3<\/strong>, 3\u201321 (2007).Article<\/a>\u00a0 Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  40. Miller, J. D. & Thode, A. E. Quantifying burn severity in a heterogeneous landscape with a relative version of the delta normalized burn ratio (dNBR). Remote Sens. Environ.<\/em> 109<\/strong>, 66\u201380 (2007).Article<\/a>\u00a0 Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  41. Pekel, J.-F., Cottam, A., Gorelick, N. & Belward, A. S. High-resolution mapping of global surface water and its long-term changes. Nature<\/em> 540<\/strong>, 418\u2013422 (2016).Article<\/a>\u00a0 CAS<\/a>\u00a0 PubMed<\/a>\u00a0 Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  42. Berner, L. T., Assmann, J. J., Normand, S. & Goetz, S. J. \u2018LandsatTS\u2019: an R package to facilitate retrieval, cleaning, cross-calibration, and phenological modeling of Landsat time series data. Ecography<\/em> 2023<\/strong>, e06768 (2023).Article<\/a>\u00a0 Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  43. Muller, S., Walker, D. A. & Jorgenson, M. T. Land Cover and Ecosystem Map Collection for Northern Alaska. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3334\/ORNLDAAC\/1359<\/a> (ORNL Distributed Active Archive Center, 2018).<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  44. Raynolds, M. K. et al. A raster version of the Circumpolar Arctic Vegetation Map (CAVM). Remote Sens. Environ.<\/em> 232<\/strong>, 111297 (2019).Article<\/a>\u00a0 Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  45. Kasischke, E. S., Williams, D. & Barry, D. Analysis of the patterns of large fires in the boreal forest region of Alaska. Int. J. Wildland Fire<\/em> 11<\/strong>, 131\u2013144 (2002).Article<\/a>\u00a0 Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  46. Smith, W. B. & Brand, G. J. Allometric Biomass Equations for 98 Species of Herbs, Shrubs, and Small Trees<\/em> (US Department of Agriculture, 1983).<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n

    Download references<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Acknowledgements<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

    This study was funded by NASA ABoVE and was supported by the NASA Terrestrial Ecology programme grant NNX15AT79A (T.V.L.).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Author information<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

    Authors and Affiliations<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
      \n
    1. Department of Geographical Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USADong Chen,\u00a0Zhihao Wang,\u00a0Allison Bredder\u00a0&\u00a0Tatiana V. Loboda<\/li>\n\n\n\n
    2. College of Information and Electrical Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing, ChinaCheng Fu<\/li>\n\n\n\n
    3. Key Laboratory of Agricultural Machinery Monitoring and Big Data Applications, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing, ChinaCheng Fu<\/li>\n\n\n\n
    4. Department of Geography, University of Zurich, Zurich, SwitzerlandCheng Fu<\/li>\n\n\n\n
    5. Michigan Tech Research Institute, Michigan Technological University, Ann Arbor, MI, USALiza K. Jenkins<\/li>\n\n\n\n
    6. State Key Laboratory of Resources and Environmental Information System, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, ChinaJiaying He<\/li>\n\n\n\n
    7. Alaska Fire Science Consortium, University of Alaska, Fairbanks, AK, USARandi R. Jandt<\/li>\n\n\n\n
    8. Alaska Biological Research, Inc., Fairbanks, AK, USAGerald V. Frost<\/li>\n\n\n\n
    9. School of Informatics, Computing and Cyber Systems, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, USALogan T. Berner<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n

      Contributions<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

      D.C.: conceptualization, methodology, software, data curation, field work, writing \u2013 original draft, writing \u2013 review and editing, visualization and project administration. C.F.: methodology and software. L.K.J.: field work. J.H.: field work and writing \u2013 review and editing. Z.W.: methodology and software. R.R.J.: writing \u2013 review and editing. G.V.F.: writing \u2013 review and editing. A.B.: writing \u2013 original draft, and writing \u2013 review and editing. L.T.B.: writing \u2013 review and editing. T.V.L.: field work, writing \u2013 review and editing, project administration and funding acquisition.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      Corresponding author<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

      Correspondence to Dong Chen<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      Ethics declarations<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

      Competing interests<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

      The authors declare no competing interests.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      Peer review<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

      Peer review information<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

      Nature Plants<\/em> thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      Additional information<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

      Publisher\u2019s note<\/strong> Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      Extended data<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

      Extended Data Fig. 1 Distribution of field sites and the four tundra subregions.<\/a><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

      The boundary of the Arctic tundra is delineated based on the Circumpolar Arctic Vegetation Map34<\/a><\/sup> (CAVM). Historical fire perimeters (red) are based on the Alaska Large Fire Database45<\/a><\/sup> from 1940 to 2021. Field data in Seward and Noatak were collected by our team, which are available at https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3334\/ORNLDAAC\/1919<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      Extended Data Fig. 2 Distribution of random sample points generated across the Alaskan tundra.<\/a><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

      Red, green, and blue points represent burned, unburned, and background sites, respectively. Panel (a<\/strong>) shows an overall view across the Alaskan tundra, while panels (b<\/strong>) and (c<\/strong>) offer close-up views of two specific locations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      Extended Data Fig. 3 The distribution of AKVEG field points.<\/a><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

      The distribution of the tundra field points that the Alaska Vegetation Plots Database (AKVEG)32<\/a><\/sup> contains.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      Extended Data Fig. 4 Scatterplots of field-measured shrub and graminoid cover and NDVImax<\/sub> by years since fire based on Landsat imagery on GEE.<\/a><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

      a<\/strong>\u2013l<\/strong>, Panels correspond to tundra subregions North Slope (a<\/strong>\u2013c<\/strong>), Noatak (d<\/strong>\u2013f<\/strong>), Seward (g<\/strong>\u2013i<\/strong>), and Southwest (j<\/strong>\u2013l<\/strong>). m<\/strong>\u2013o<\/strong>, Panels correspond to all of the Alaskan tundra. Symbols \u2018*\u2019 and \u2018**\u2019 after the correlation (R) values correspond to p < 0.01 and 0.001, respectively. Field data were from AKVEG. DS: deciduous shrub; ES: evergreen shrub; GD: graminoid.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      Extended Data Fig. 5 Mean biomass of four dominant shrub species for each stand age group calculated based on 1 x 1m plots in Noatak (a<\/strong>) and Seward (b<\/strong>).<\/a><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

      YSF: year since fire. Birch: Betula nana;<\/em> Blueberry: Vaccinium uliginosum;<\/em> Ledum: Rhododendron groenlandicum<\/em> (bog Labrador tea); Salix: Salix spp<\/em>. Error bars denote \u00b11 standard error. Crosses represent the values of the mean biomass. The actual data, including the numbers of observations, are listed in Supplementary Table 2<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      Extended Data Fig. 6 Post-fire NDVImax<\/sub> anomaly trajectories for different physiognomic types and for high severity level burned points.<\/a><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

      Post-fire NDVImax<\/sub> anomaly trajectories for different physiognomic types (according to the 1 km CAVM raster dataset44<\/a><\/sup>) and for high severity level burned points. a<\/strong>\u2013d<\/strong>, Tundra subregions North Slope (a<\/strong>), Noatak (b<\/strong>), Seward (c<\/strong>) and Southwest (d<\/strong>). Error bars denote \u00b11 standard error. The pie charts on the right show the relative proportions of the different physiognomic types among all high severity burned points in the corresponding subregion. The actual data, including the numbers of observations, are listed in Supplementary Table 3<\/a> (the trajectories) and Supplementary Table 4<\/a> (the pie charts), respectively.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      Extended Data Fig. 7 Proportions of mean total biomass of four dominant shrub species for each stand age group calculated based on 1 x 1m plots in Noatak (a<\/strong>) and Seward (b<\/strong>).<\/a><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

      YSF: year since fire. Birch: Betula nana;<\/em> Blueberry: Vaccinium uliginosum;<\/em> Ledum: Rhododendron groenlandicum<\/em> (bog Labrador tea); Willow: Salix spp<\/em>. Error bars denote \u00b11 standard error. Crosses represent the values of the mean biomass. The actual data, including the numbers of observations, are listed in Supplementary Table 5<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      Extended Data Fig. 8 NDVImax<\/sub> trajectories between 2001 and 2021 based on matching burned and background sample points.<\/a><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

      a<\/strong>\u2013d,<\/strong> Panels correspond to tundra subregions North Slope (a<\/strong>), Noatak (b<\/strong>), Seward (c<\/strong>) and Southwest (d<\/strong>). Error bars denote \u00b11 standard error. The actual data, including the numbers of observations, are listed in Supplementary Table 6<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      Supplementary information<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

      Supplementary Information<\/a><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

      Supplementary Tables 1\u20136.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      Reporting Summary<\/a><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

      Rights and permissions<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

      Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

      Arctic tundra has experienced rapid warming, outpacing global averages, leading to significant greening whose primary drivers include widespread shrubification. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":2426,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"rop_custom_images_group":[],"rop_custom_messages_group":[],"rop_publish_now":"initial","rop_publish_now_accounts":[],"rop_publish_now_history":[],"rop_publish_now_status":"pending","_themeisle_gutenberg_block_has_review":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2425","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-analysis"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/arcticwatch.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2425","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/arcticwatch.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/arcticwatch.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/arcticwatch.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/arcticwatch.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2425"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/arcticwatch.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2425\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2427,"href":"https:\/\/arcticwatch.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2425\/revisions\/2427"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/arcticwatch.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2426"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/arcticwatch.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2425"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/arcticwatch.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2425"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/arcticwatch.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2425"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}