{"id":221,"date":"2023-03-15T05:50:05","date_gmt":"2023-03-15T05:50:05","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/arcticwatch.info\/index.php\/2023\/03\/15\/facts-about-the-arctic-in-december-2022\/"},"modified":"2025-07-14T00:58:18","modified_gmt":"2025-07-13T22:58:18","slug":"facts-about-the-arctic-in-december-2022","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/arcticwatch.info\/index.php\/2023\/03\/15\/facts-about-the-arctic-in-december-2022\/","title":{"rendered":"Facts About the Arctic in December 2022"},"content":{"rendered":"<div>\n<p>A new month is upon us and Christmas is coming! Here\u2019s another look at Lars Kaleschke\u2019s high resolution AMSR2 <a href=\"https:\/\/sites.google.com\/view\/sea-ice\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">area and extent graphs<\/a> for the Arctic as a whole:<\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><a href=\"https:\/\/greatwhitecon.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/AWI-Arctic-Area-2022-12-01.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-20293\" src=\"https:\/\/arcticwatch.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/AWI-Arctic-Area-2022-12-01-1024x512-1.png\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" srcset=\"https:\/\/arcticwatch.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/AWI-Arctic-Area-2022-12-01-1024x512-1.png 1024w, https:\/\/greatwhitecon.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/AWI-Arctic-Area-2022-12-01-300x150.png 300w, https:\/\/greatwhitecon.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/AWI-Arctic-Area-2022-12-01-768x384.png 768w, https:\/\/greatwhitecon.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/AWI-Arctic-Area-2022-12-01.png 1500w\" alt=\"\" width=\"1024\" height=\"512\" \/><\/a><\/figure>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><a href=\"https:\/\/greatwhitecon.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/AWI-Arctic-Extent-2022-12-01.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-20294\" src=\"https:\/\/arcticwatch.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/AWI-Arctic-Extent-2022-12-01-1024x540-1.png\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" srcset=\"https:\/\/arcticwatch.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/AWI-Arctic-Extent-2022-12-01-1024x540-1.png 1024w, https:\/\/greatwhitecon.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/AWI-Arctic-Extent-2022-12-01-300x158.png 300w, https:\/\/greatwhitecon.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/AWI-Arctic-Extent-2022-12-01-768x405.png 768w, https:\/\/greatwhitecon.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/AWI-Arctic-Extent-2022-12-01.png 1422w\" alt=\"\" width=\"1024\" height=\"540\" \/><\/a><\/figure>\n<p>Extent increase stalled for the last few days of November, and as a result extent is now in a \u201cstatistical tie\u201d with 2017 for 4th lowest extent for the date in the AMSR2 record.<\/p>\n<p>The <a href=\"ftp:\/\/ftp-projects.cen.uni-hamburg.de\/seaice\/AMSR2\/3.125km\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">AMSR2 concentration map<\/a> reveals that the Chukchi Sea is now mostly refrozen:<\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><a href=\"https:\/\/greatwhitecon.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/Arc_20221201_res3.125.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-20295\" src=\"https:\/\/arcticwatch.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/Arc_20221201_res3.125-874x1024-1.jpg\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 874px) 100vw, 874px\" srcset=\"https:\/\/arcticwatch.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/Arc_20221201_res3.125-874x1024-1.jpg 874w, https:\/\/greatwhitecon.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/Arc_20221201_res3.125-256x300.jpg 256w, https:\/\/greatwhitecon.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/Arc_20221201_res3.125-768x900.jpg 768w, https:\/\/greatwhitecon.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/Arc_20221201_res3.125.jpg 1280w\" alt=\"\" width=\"874\" height=\"1024\" \/><\/a><\/figure>\n<p>However over on the Atlantic side of the Arctic there is now more open water than average in the Barents Sea:<\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><a href=\"https:\/\/greatwhitecon.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/AWI-Barents-Extent-2022-12-01.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-20296\" src=\"https:\/\/arcticwatch.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/AWI-Barents-Extent-2022-12-01-1024x512-1.png\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" srcset=\"https:\/\/arcticwatch.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/AWI-Barents-Extent-2022-12-01-1024x512-1.png 1024w, https:\/\/greatwhitecon.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/AWI-Barents-Extent-2022-12-01-300x150.png 300w, https:\/\/greatwhitecon.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/AWI-Barents-Extent-2022-12-01-768x384.png 768w, https:\/\/greatwhitecon.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/AWI-Barents-Extent-2022-12-01.png 1500w\" alt=\"\" width=\"1024\" height=\"512\" \/><\/a><\/figure>\n<p>After a rapid rise at the start of November extent in the Kara Sea has barely increased over the last two weeks:<\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><a href=\"https:\/\/greatwhitecon.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/AWI-Kara-Extent-2022-12-01.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-20298\" src=\"https:\/\/arcticwatch.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/AWI-Kara-Extent-2022-12-01-1024x512-1.png\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" srcset=\"https:\/\/arcticwatch.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/AWI-Kara-Extent-2022-12-01-1024x512-1.png 1024w, https:\/\/greatwhitecon.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/AWI-Kara-Extent-2022-12-01-300x150.png 300w, https:\/\/greatwhitecon.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/AWI-Kara-Extent-2022-12-01-768x384.png 768w, https:\/\/greatwhitecon.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/AWI-Kara-Extent-2022-12-01.png 1500w\" alt=\"\" width=\"1024\" height=\"512\" \/><\/a><\/figure>\n<p>Looking at the third dimension next, here is the latest <a href=\"https:\/\/spaces.awi.de\/display\/CS2SMOS\/CryoSat-SMOS+Merged+Sea+Ice+Thickness\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">AWI CryoSat-2\/SMOS<\/a> Arctic sea ice thickness map:<\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><a href=\"https:\/\/arcticwatch.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/W_XX-ESASMOS_CS2NH_25KM_EASE2_20221124_20221130_o_v205_01_l4sit.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-20299\" src=\"https:\/\/arcticwatch.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/W_XX-ESASMOS_CS2NH_25KM_EASE2_20221124_20221130_o_v205_01_l4sit.png\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 832px) 100vw, 832px\" srcset=\"https:\/\/arcticwatch.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/W_XX-ESASMOS_CS2NH_25KM_EASE2_20221124_20221130_o_v205_01_l4sit.png 832w, https:\/\/greatwhitecon.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/W_XX-ESASMOS_CS2NH_25KM_EASE2_20221124_20221130_o_v205_01_l4sit-250x300.png 250w, https:\/\/greatwhitecon.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/W_XX-ESASMOS_CS2NH_25KM_EASE2_20221124_20221130_o_v205_01_l4sit-768x923.png 768w\" alt=\"\" width=\"832\" height=\"1000\" \/><\/a><\/figure>\n<p>Rather than piled up along the north coasts of Greenland and Ellesmere Island as in days gone by, the thickest remaining ice currently appears to be in the Central Arctic north-west of the Canadian Arctic Archipelago.<\/p>\n<p>Finally, for the moment at least, here is the latest CS2\/SMOS volume graph:<\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><a href=\"https:\/\/arcticwatch.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/CS2-SMOS_20221201.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-20327\" src=\"https:\/\/arcticwatch.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/CS2-SMOS_20221201.png\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 954px) 100vw, 954px\" srcset=\"https:\/\/arcticwatch.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/CS2-SMOS_20221201.png 954w, https:\/\/greatwhitecon.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/CS2-SMOS_20221201-300x198.png 300w, https:\/\/greatwhitecon.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/CS2-SMOS_20221201-768x507.png 768w\" alt=\"\" width=\"954\" height=\"630\" \/><\/a><\/figure>\n<p><a name=\"Dec-04\"><\/a><strong>[Edit \u2013 December 4th]<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>News <a href=\"https:\/\/forum.arctic-sea-ice.net\/index.php\/topic,3863.msg352544.html#msg352544\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">via the ASIF<\/a> of a recent journal article discussing the \u201c<a href=\"http:\/\/greatwhitecon.info\/2022\/01\/facts-about-the-arctic-in-january-2022\/#Jan-25\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Great Arctic Winter Cyclone<\/a>\u201d of 2022. In a paper entitled \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1029\/2022JD037161\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Record Arctic Cyclone of January 2022: Characteristics, Impacts, and Predictability<\/a>\u201d Ed Blanchard-Wrigglesworth et al. point out that:<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\"><p>The cyclone resulted in a record (over the period 1979\u20132022) weekly loss of regional sea ice area and surface wind speeds, and generated ocean waves exceeding 8\u00a0m that impinged on sea ice in the Barents sea, observed via satellite altimetry as large waves-in-sea ice up to 2\u00a0m in amplitude more than 100\u00a0km into the ice pack. Surface heat fluxes were strongly impacted by the cyclone, with record atmosphere-to-surface turbulent fluxes. However, the direct atmospheric thermodynamic impact on sea ice loss was modest, and the record sea ice changes were likely mainly driven by dynamical and\/or ocean processes. While the storm was well predicted up to 8\u00a0days in advance, subsequent changes in sea ice cover were not, likely due to biases in the forecasts\u2019 sea ice initial conditions and missing physics in the forecast model such as wave-sea ice interaction.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-full\"><a href=\"https:\/\/arcticwatch.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/jgrd58288-fig-0001-m.webp\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-20320\" src=\"https:\/\/arcticwatch.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/jgrd58288-fig-0001-m.webp\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 468px) 100vw, 468px\" srcset=\"https:\/\/arcticwatch.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/jgrd58288-fig-0001-m.webp 468w, https:\/\/greatwhitecon.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/jgrd58288-fig-0001-m-281x300.webp 281w\" alt=\"\" width=\"468\" height=\"500\" \/><\/a><figcaption>Conditions on 24 January at 13:00 UTC, showing SLP (contours) and SIC (shading), panel (a) and significant wave height and direction (panel b). Monthly minimum hourly SLP over 70\u00b0N\u201390\u00b0N and 80\u00b0N\u201390\u00b0N (panels c and d) for all months, January 1979\u2013January 2022. The minimum values during the January 2022 cyclone are shown by the dashed horizontal lines in (c and d). The asterisks denote the 10 extreme cyclones in each domain prior to January 2022.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<p><a name=\"Dec-07\"><\/a><strong>[Edit \u2013 December 7th]<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>PIOMAS Arctic sea ice <a href=\"http:\/\/psc.apl.uw.edu\/research\/projects\/arctic-sea-ice-volume-anomaly\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">volume and thickness data<\/a> for November 2022 has been released:<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\"><p>Average Arctic sea ice volume in November 2022 was 9,700 km<sup>3<\/sup>. This value is the 10th lowest on record for November,\u00a0 about\u00a0 1,900 km <sup>3<\/sup> above the\u00a0 low record set in 2016. \u00a0 Monthly\u00a0 ice volume was 51% below the maximum in 1979 and 32% below the mean value for 1979-2021. Average November 2022 ice volume was\u00a01.4 standard deviations above the 1979-2021 trend line\u2026<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><a href=\"https:\/\/greatwhitecon.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/PIOMAS-volume_2022-11.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-20347\" src=\"https:\/\/arcticwatch.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/PIOMAS-volume_2022-11-1024x784-1.png\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" srcset=\"https:\/\/arcticwatch.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/PIOMAS-volume_2022-11-1024x784-1.png 1024w, https:\/\/greatwhitecon.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/PIOMAS-volume_2022-11-300x230.png 300w, https:\/\/greatwhitecon.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/PIOMAS-volume_2022-11-768x588.png 768w, https:\/\/greatwhitecon.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/PIOMAS-volume_2022-11.png 1303w\" alt=\"\" width=\"1024\" height=\"784\" \/><\/a><\/figure>\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\"><p>The ice thickness anomaly map for November 2022 relative to 2011-2020 shows\u00a0 further strengthening\u00a0 of the\u00a0 positive anomalies north of\u00a0 Greenland and\u00a0 along the Canadian Archipelago:<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><a href=\"https:\/\/greatwhitecon.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/PIOMAS-thickness_anomaly_2022-11.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-20348\" src=\"https:\/\/arcticwatch.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/PIOMAS-thickness_anomaly_2022-11-1024x684-1.png\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" srcset=\"https:\/\/arcticwatch.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/PIOMAS-thickness_anomaly_2022-11-1024x684-1.png 1024w, https:\/\/greatwhitecon.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/PIOMAS-thickness_anomaly_2022-11-300x200.png 300w, https:\/\/greatwhitecon.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/PIOMAS-thickness_anomaly_2022-11-768x513.png 768w, https:\/\/greatwhitecon.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/PIOMAS-thickness_anomaly_2022-11.png 1483w\" alt=\"\" width=\"1024\" height=\"684\" \/><\/a><\/figure>\n<p>Here too is the \u201cunofficial\u201d thickness map derived from the gridded thickness data:<\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><a href=\"https:\/\/arcticwatch.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/PIOMAS-thickness_2022-11-30.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-20350\" src=\"https:\/\/arcticwatch.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/PIOMAS-thickness_2022-11-30.png\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 880px) 100vw, 880px\" srcset=\"https:\/\/arcticwatch.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/PIOMAS-thickness_2022-11-30.png 880w, https:\/\/greatwhitecon.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/PIOMAS-thickness_2022-11-30-300x196.png 300w, https:\/\/greatwhitecon.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/PIOMAS-thickness_2022-11-30-768x503.png 768w\" alt=\"\" width=\"880\" height=\"576\" \/><\/a><\/figure>\n<p>Note the traditional build up of ice along the northern coast of the Canadian Arctic Archipelago which is absent from this CryoSat-2\/SMOS thickness map:<\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><a href=\"https:\/\/arcticwatch.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/CS2-SMOS-thickness_2022-11-30.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-20351\" src=\"https:\/\/arcticwatch.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/CS2-SMOS-thickness_2022-11-30.png\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 880px) 100vw, 880px\" srcset=\"https:\/\/arcticwatch.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/CS2-SMOS-thickness_2022-11-30.png 880w, https:\/\/greatwhitecon.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/CS2-SMOS-thickness_2022-11-30-300x196.png 300w, https:\/\/greatwhitecon.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/CS2-SMOS-thickness_2022-11-30-768x503.png 768w\" alt=\"\" width=\"880\" height=\"576\" \/><\/a><\/figure>\n<p><a name=\"Dec-14\"><\/a><strong>[Edit \u2013 December 14th]<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The 2022 edition of NOAA\u2019s <a href=\"https:\/\/www.arctic.noaa.gov\/Report-Card\/Report-Card-2022\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Arctic Report Card<\/a> has just been published. Here\u2019s an introductory video:<\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-embed is-type-video is-provider-youtube wp-block-embed-youtube wp-embed-aspect-16-9 wp-has-aspect-ratio\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-embed__wrapper\"><iframe loading=\"lazy\" title=\"Arctic Report Card 2022\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/MDG-moe0tZs?feature=oembed\" width=\"604\" height=\"340\" frameborder=\"0\" allowfullscreen=\"allowfullscreen\"><\/iframe><\/div>\n<\/figure>\n<p>According to the accompanying <a href=\"https:\/\/www.noaa.gov\/news-release\/human-caused-climate-change-fuels-warmer-wetter-stormier-arctic\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">press release<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\"><p>Arctic\u00a0annual air temperatures\u00a0from October 2021 to September 2022 were the sixth warmest dating back to 1900, continuing a decades-long trend in which Arctic air temperatures have warmed faster than the global average. The Arctic\u2019s seven warmest years since 1900 have been the last seven years:<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><a href=\"https:\/\/greatwhitecon.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/16x9_Arctic-Report-Card-2022_surface-temperatures_map_graph_16x9.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-20465\" src=\"https:\/\/arcticwatch.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/16x9_Arctic-Report-Card-2022_surface-temperatures_map_graph_16x9-1024x577-1.png\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" srcset=\"https:\/\/arcticwatch.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/16x9_Arctic-Report-Card-2022_surface-temperatures_map_graph_16x9-1024x577-1.png 1024w, https:\/\/greatwhitecon.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/16x9_Arctic-Report-Card-2022_surface-temperatures_map_graph_16x9-300x169.png 300w, https:\/\/greatwhitecon.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/16x9_Arctic-Report-Card-2022_surface-temperatures_map_graph_16x9-768x432.png 768w, https:\/\/greatwhitecon.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/16x9_Arctic-Report-Card-2022_surface-temperatures_map_graph_16x9-1536x865.png 1536w, https:\/\/greatwhitecon.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/16x9_Arctic-Report-Card-2022_surface-temperatures_map_graph_16x9-2048x1153.png 2048w\" alt=\"\" width=\"1024\" height=\"577\" \/><\/a><\/figure>\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\"><p>Arctic\u00a0sea ice\u00a0extent (coverage) was higher than many recent years, but much lower than the long-term average. Multiyear ice extent, sea-ice thickness and volume rebounded after a near-record low in 2021, but was below conditions in the 1980s and 1990s, with older ice extremely rare. Open water developed near the North Pole for much of the summer, allowing polar-class tourist and research vessels easy access. The Northern Sea Route and Northwest Passage were also largely open\u2026<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><a href=\"https:\/\/greatwhitecon.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/Arctic-Report-Card-2022_Sea-Ice_map_graph_16x9.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-20466\" src=\"https:\/\/arcticwatch.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/Arctic-Report-Card-2022_Sea-Ice_map_graph_16x9-1024x577-1.png\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" srcset=\"https:\/\/arcticwatch.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/Arctic-Report-Card-2022_Sea-Ice_map_graph_16x9-1024x577-1.png 1024w, https:\/\/greatwhitecon.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/Arctic-Report-Card-2022_Sea-Ice_map_graph_16x9-300x169.png 300w, https:\/\/greatwhitecon.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/Arctic-Report-Card-2022_Sea-Ice_map_graph_16x9-768x432.png 768w, https:\/\/greatwhitecon.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/Arctic-Report-Card-2022_Sea-Ice_map_graph_16x9-1536x865.png 1536w, https:\/\/greatwhitecon.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/Arctic-Report-Card-2022_Sea-Ice_map_graph_16x9-2048x1153.png 2048w\" alt=\"\" width=\"1024\" height=\"577\" \/><\/a><\/figure>\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\"><p>The 2021-2022 Arctic\u00a0snow season\u00a0saw a combination of above-average snow accumulation but early snowmelt, consistent with long-term trends of shortening snow seasons in several areas.<\/p>\n<p>Wetter-than-normal conditions predominated over much of the Arctic from October 2021 to September 2022.\u00a0Precipitation\u00a0has increased significantly since the 1950s across all seasons and datasets. Heavy precipitation events are more common in the North Atlantic subarctic, while much of the central Arctic shows increases in consecutive wet days and decreases in consecutive dry days\u2026<\/p>\n<p>The\u00a0Greenland ice sheet\u00a0lost ice in 2022, the 25th consecutive year of ice loss. In September 2022, the Greenland ice sheet had unprecedented late-season warming, creating surface melt conditions over 36% of the ice sheet on September 3, including the Greenland ice sheet\u2019s summit at 10,500 feet. This followed a July 18 large surface melt event observed across 42% of the Greenland ice sheet surface.<\/p>\n<p>The August 2022\u00a0sea surface temperatures\u00a0continued to show a warming trend that has been observed since 1982 for much of the ice-free Arctic Ocean. In the Barents and Laptev seas, August 2022 mean sea surface temperatures were 3.5 to 5.5 degrees Fahrenheit (2 to 3\u00b0C) warmer than 1991\u20132020 August mean values while unusually cool August sea surface temperatures of 5.4 degrees Fahrenheit (3 degrees Celsius) below the trend occurred in the Chukchi Sea, likely driven by late-summer sea ice in the region that was kept in place by the winds.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><a name=\"Dec-25\"><\/a><strong>[Edit \u2013 December 25th]<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>According to<a href=\"https:\/\/www.flightradar24.com\/R3DN053\/2ea2ef9b\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\"> FlightRadar24<\/a> Santa Claus has recently completed his final deliveries to Alaska:<\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><a href=\"https:\/\/greatwhitecon.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/Santa-2022-12-25_09-00.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-20632\" src=\"https:\/\/arcticwatch.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/Santa-2022-12-25_09-00-1024x596-1.png\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" srcset=\"https:\/\/arcticwatch.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/Santa-2022-12-25_09-00-1024x596-1.png 1024w, https:\/\/greatwhitecon.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/Santa-2022-12-25_09-00-300x175.png 300w, https:\/\/greatwhitecon.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/Santa-2022-12-25_09-00-768x447.png 768w, https:\/\/greatwhitecon.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/Santa-2022-12-25_09-00.png 1096w\" alt=\"\" width=\"1024\" height=\"596\" \/><\/a><\/figure>\n<p>In other news from the far north here\u2019s the mid December PIOMAS Arctic sea ice thickness map:<\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><a href=\"https:\/\/arcticwatch.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/PIOMAS-thickness_on_2022-12-15.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-20633\" src=\"https:\/\/arcticwatch.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/PIOMAS-thickness_on_2022-12-15.png\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 880px) 100vw, 880px\" srcset=\"https:\/\/arcticwatch.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/PIOMAS-thickness_on_2022-12-15.png 880w, https:\/\/greatwhitecon.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/PIOMAS-thickness_on_2022-12-15-300x196.png 300w, https:\/\/greatwhitecon.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/PIOMAS-thickness_on_2022-12-15-768x503.png 768w\" alt=\"\" width=\"880\" height=\"576\" \/><\/a><\/figure>\n<p>together with the CryoSat-2\/SMOS equivalent:<\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><a href=\"https:\/\/arcticwatch.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/CS2-SMOS-thickness_2022-12-15.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-20634\" src=\"https:\/\/arcticwatch.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/CS2-SMOS-thickness_2022-12-15.png\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 880px) 100vw, 880px\" srcset=\"https:\/\/arcticwatch.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/CS2-SMOS-thickness_2022-12-15.png 880w, https:\/\/greatwhitecon.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/CS2-SMOS-thickness_2022-12-15-300x196.png 300w, https:\/\/greatwhitecon.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/CS2-SMOS-thickness_2022-12-15-768x503.png 768w\" alt=\"\" width=\"880\" height=\"576\" \/><\/a><\/figure>\n<p>CryoSat continues to show significantly thinner ice than PIOMAS in the area north of Greenland and the CAA. It does however reveal some thicker ice north of Svalbard.<\/p>\n<p>Further news is now available on the\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/greatwhitecon.info\/2023\/01\/facts-about-the-arctic-in-january-2023\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">January 2023 open thread<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Extent increase stalled for the last few days of November, and as a result extent is now in a \u201cstatistical tie\u201d with 2017 for 4th lowest extent for the date.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":222,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"rop_custom_images_group":[],"rop_custom_messages_group":[],"rop_publish_now":"initial","rop_publish_now_accounts":[],"rop_publish_now_history":[],"rop_publish_now_status":"pending","_themeisle_gutenberg_block_has_review":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-221","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-analysis"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/arcticwatch.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/221","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/arcticwatch.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/arcticwatch.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/arcticwatch.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/arcticwatch.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=221"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/arcticwatch.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/221\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3256,"href":"https:\/\/arcticwatch.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/221\/revisions\/3256"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/arcticwatch.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/222"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/arcticwatch.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=221"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/arcticwatch.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=221"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/arcticwatch.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=221"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}