{"id":2036,"date":"2024-08-09T00:54:00","date_gmt":"2024-08-08T22:54:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/arcticwatch.info\/?p=2036"},"modified":"2024-08-06T03:01:39","modified_gmt":"2024-08-06T01:01:39","slug":"climate-change-may-lead-to-shifts-in-vital-pacific-arctic-fisheries","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/arcticwatch.info\/index.php\/2024\/08\/09\/climate-change-may-lead-to-shifts-in-vital-pacific-arctic-fisheries\/","title":{"rendered":"Climate change may lead to shifts in vital Pacific Arctic fisheries"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Commercially important marine fish and invertebrate species will likely shift northwards under a warmer climate.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Trajectories of the abundance-weighted center of gravity (COG) for eight commercial species from modeled abundance from the present (2000-2019) to future periods (2021-2100) under the (a) SSP126 and (b) SSP585 climate scenarios. Overlain on the maps are the land masses (hachures) for reference and the US-Russia exclusive economic zone (EEZ) boundary (dashed line). Species photo credits (https:\/\/www.fisheries.noaa.gov\/species\/<\/a>). (Irene D. Alabia, et al. PLOS ONE. June 06, 2024) <\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Marine fisheries are an essential source of protein for a large part of the world\u2019s population, as well as supporting around 390 million livelihoods and an industry worth approximately US$ 141 billion, according to the UN FAO. Yet, climate change presents a major threat to the world\u2019s fisheries, particularly in the Pacific Arctic. The eastern Bering Sea and Chukchi Sea\u2014which contain eight of the most productive fisheries in the world\u2014are already experiencing significant climatic shifts that have contributed to the surprise collapse of two important species, snow crab and Pacific cod.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

To better understand the potential impact of climate change on fisheries in the region, a research team from Hokkaido University, The University of Tokyo, and the National Institute of Polar Research used bioeconomic modeling to study how the abundance and distribution of eight commercially important marine fish and invertebrate species might change under a range of climate scenarios from 2021-2100. The study was published in the journal PLOS ONE.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cThe movement of fish stocks or populations out of their traditional fishing grounds can be challenging for resource managers and stakeholders, exacerbating the risks of overexploitation and the race to fish,\u201d says Irene D. Alabia, a climate change researcher at the Arctic Research Center at Hokkaido University in Japan.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The researchers\u2019 model includes biological parameters, such as population growth rate and fishing mortality rate, and economic parameters, such as the costs and income associated with each species\u2019 fishery. The team modeled four climate-based socioeconomic pathway scenarios: sustainable development, middle of the road, regional rivalry and fossil-fuelled development.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

The averaged maximum catch potential (MCP) within the US Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) computed at each 100-km buffer zone from the Dutch Harbor (left) and Port of Nome (right) for the present (2000-2019) and future periods (2021-2100) under SSP585. (Irene D. Alabia, et al. PLOS ONE. June 06, 2024)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The analysis suggested that under low to moderate levels of climate change, well-managed marine ecosystems may experience only limited economic impacts between now and 2040. However, more extreme warming, including the loss of sea ice, would have more severe impacts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

All the climate scenarios pointed to a shift northward for all of the species studied due to the loss of sea ice habitat and warmer water temperatures in the eastern Bering Sea. The most significant shift in abundance was predicted for Greenland halibut, with the fishery\u2019s center of gravity forecast to move by more than 80 kilometers per decade under the highest impact climate scenario. In contrast, the walleye pollock fishery was projected to shift around 30 kilometers per decade.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Even in the most extreme climate scenario, the news wasn\u2019t all bad. The abundance of Pacific cod was forecast to increase, but the high-value snow crab was forecast to decrease.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cThe magnitude of abundance changes varied across species, identifying potential winners and losers under climate change and hinting at the potential restructuring of future marine communities in the Pacific Arctic region,\u201d Alabia said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The researchers stressed the importance of climate-smart solutions to protect and preserve marine fisheries in order to support food security and ensure a sustainable fishery sector under climate change.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

(From left) Irene D. Alabia, Jorge Garc\u00eda Molinos, Takafumi Hirata, Daiju Narita, and Toru Hirawake of the research team. (Photos: Aprilia Agatha Gunawan, Manami Kawamoto, Takafumi Hirata, Daiju Narita, Toru Hirawake)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Commercially important marine fish and invertebrate species will likely shift northwards under a warmer climate.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":2037,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"rop_custom_images_group":[],"rop_custom_messages_group":[],"rop_publish_now":"initial","rop_publish_now_accounts":[],"rop_publish_now_history":[],"rop_publish_now_status":"pending","_themeisle_gutenberg_block_has_review":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2036","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-industry"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/arcticwatch.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2036","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/arcticwatch.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/arcticwatch.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/arcticwatch.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/arcticwatch.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2036"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/arcticwatch.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2036\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2040,"href":"https:\/\/arcticwatch.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2036\/revisions\/2040"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/arcticwatch.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2037"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/arcticwatch.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2036"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/arcticwatch.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2036"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/arcticwatch.info\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2036"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}